You're Not Pretty Enough
YNPE Trailer

Speakeasy DC Appearance

January 3rd, 2012

 

From the (always super fun) Speakeasy show in October: “stories about reversals of fortune, winning it big, and losing it all.” You can see all the performances from that night here.

 

Jennifer Tress tells true story on SpeakeasyDC stage from SpeakeasyDC on Vimeo.

The Sex Papers! On the Huffington Post!

October 30th, 2011

 

I didn’t even know this existed before tonight (I missed my Facebook feed that day. It happens).

 

Still when I ask myself the following question: Is there a statute of limitation on promoting the fact that your childhood porno drawings were in the mother-fucking-Huffington Post? I answer myself back: I THINK NOT.

 

If you get the chance to see a Mortified Show, go. Great performers. Great crowds. And pre-sales go quick.

 

 

First Chapter of You’re Not Pretty Enough is out

September 26th, 2011

 

“Sex Education” released as part of this Pinchback Press anthology!

 

Jen at Fan-Freakin-Tastic 9.17.11

September 19th, 2011

 

In which I deconstruct the complicated feelings I have about my ass. Check out Vijai Nathan’s Fan-Freakin-Tastic Show (a comedy show featuring comics, storytellers, musical acts and poets). Each month at Chief Ike’s!

 

Jen at Fan-Freakin-Tastic 9.17.11 from Jennifer Tress on Vimeo.

September and October 2011 Shows/Appearances

September 1st, 2011

 

I’ll be reading or performing several stories over the next couple months in a variety of great shows hosted by the city’s best. Hopefully I’ll see you at one or more (check back at YNPE HQ for updates)…

 

 

 

 

Story League Story Contest!

 

Date/Time: Thursday, September 8 from 9:00-10:30

 

Place: Busboys & Poets, 2021 14th Street NW (corner of 14th and V), D.C.

 

Cost: $10 at the door

 

QUALIFIER FOR THIS EVENT ONLY: Prospective “tellers” will submit a brief summary of their stories and the judges/hosts will select the ones they’d like to see performed, so no guarantee I’ll appear in this one, but I will be there enjoying it, regardless.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Fan-Freaking-Tastic” is a monthly comedy party hosted by Comedienne Vijai Nathan. DC’s best Stand-Ups, Storytellers & Slam Poets come together to make you laugh and take on the monthly theme.

 

Date/Time: Saturday, September 17 from 7:00 to 9:00

 

Place: Chief Ike’s Mambo Room, 1725 Columbia Road NW, D.C. (Adam’s Morgan)

 

Cost: $15 at the door

 

 

 

 

 

Mortified!

 

Date/Time: Thursday, October 6 from 8:00 to 10:00

 

Place: Town, 2009 8th Street NW, 20009 (corner of 8th and U)

 

Cost: $10 in advance, $15 at the door

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Speakeasy: Jackpot! Stories about reversals of fortune, hitting the big time, or losing it all.

 

Date/Time: Tuesday, October 11 from 8:00 to 9:30

 

Place: Town, 2009 8th Street NW, 20009 (corner of 8th and U)

 

Cost: $14 in advance, $15 at the door

 

 

 

 

 

Launch party for the new anthology Tarnished: True Tales of Innocence Lost with co-editor Cara Bruce and contributors Valley Haggard, Julie Geen, Tambre Leighn and Jennifer Tress (I’ll be reading my story “Sex Education.”)

 

Date/Time: Saturday, October 15 from 7:00 to 8:30

 

Place: Atomic Books in Baltimore, MD.

 

Cost: Free!

I called all my Congressmen today to ask where they stood on the debt ceiling debate.

July 29th, 2011

 

About six or seven years ago I created a gmail account under the alias “Stephanie Freedom” so I could send Fox News emails saying “Fair and balanced my ass!” I am sure I was drunk when this idea hit me and when I used the account. Like most things conjured up during a boozy haze, I lost interest after a few weeks…but Stephanie still comes out to play when the political system irks/frustrates her and today she/I (we?) called every Congressman from the great state of Virginia (I’m not being politically incorrect, there isn’t a woman in the bunch).  Nearly every call was answered by a live person.

 

I took notes, and the results may surprise you.

 

First up…Rob Wittman-R.

 

[Rob Wittman]

Me: Hi, my name is Jennifer and a I’m a constituent. I’d like to understand what the Congressman’s position is on the debt ceiling debate [This sentence heretofore known as INTRO].
Staffer: Well, what are your concerns?
Me: I’m concerned that he’s backing a bill that we have all been told will be vetoed and therefore wasting precious time.
Staffer: I’m happy to pass that on.
Me: Great, but can you tell me if he’s backing Boehner’s plan?
Staffer: I’m not sure.
Me: You’re not sure?
Staffer: No
Me:

 

Gerry Connolly-D

 

[Gerald E. (Gerry) Connolly]

Me: INTRO
Staffer: I haven’t spoken to him. I’m an intern.
Me: Ok, can you pass me to someone who understands his position? [On hold]
Staffer: He’s on the floor right now.
Me: [thinking, was I on hold for a staffer or the congressman?] Ok, I’ll call back.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bobby Scott-D

 

[Bobby Scott]
Me: INTRO
Staffer: Good question; he voted against Boehner’s bill this morning, the issue is that: we haven’t seen Reid’s bill. We want to be good stewards of the taxpayer dollar, so we’re not committing to Reid’s bill until we see it.
Me: I’ve heard that’s tonight?
Staffer: Right, that’s the latest. We haven’t seen all of what is involved, but I’m sure if Reid’s plan is equitable and something that… [stumbles]…I really can’t say that…um, we’re looking for something that makes sense.
Me: [laughs]
Staffer: [laughs] It’s a tough situation. Such a waste of time, but you have to go through the process; we’ll be here over the weekend so call anytime to check the status.

 

Bob Goodlatte-R

 

[Bob Goodlatte]

Me: INTRO
Staffer: I haven’t personally spoken to him…
Me: Do you think you’ll know this weekend?
Staffer: I believe so.
Me: I hope so.
Staffer:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jim Moran-D

 

[Jim Moran]
Me: INTRO
Staffer: Well, he’s against Boehner’s plan, but we don’t know what’s coming down the pike. We’ll be here all weekend, so feel free to check back in.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frank Wolf-R

 

[Frank R. Wolf]

Me: INTRO
Staffer: Well, I know two things, he is backing the Boehner plan because it is the only thing on the table BUT he supports any bi-partisan debate.
Me: I’m concerned that he’s backing Boehner’s plan when we know it will end in a veto.
Staffer: Well, I’m happy to pass that on but remember he’s doing it because it’s the only thing that’s on the table and he wants to move us forward.
Me: How is that moving us forward when we all know it’s dead on arrival!?!
Staffer [clearly weary]: Ok m’am, I’ll pass that on.
Me: [thinking, can't we come up for a better female equivalent for "sir" than "m'am?"]

 

 

Scott Rigell-R

 

[Scott Rigell]
Intro: I watched a youtube video on his homepage where the Congressman answers what his Communications Director deemed frequently asked questions. These ran the gamut from Q: What is the difference between the deficit and the debt? A: instructive answer; Q: How did we get here? A: blah, blah, blah…abstract answer.

Me: INTRO
Staffer: Well, I just got off the phone with the Communications Director and here’s the most up to date information. During the campaign on through today, the Congressman has always had a platform of paying debts we have incurred while reducing spending. He’s working with the Republicans and it’s important to the Congressman that this legislation include a balanced budget amendment.
Me: But why now? The timing just seems off considering the deadlines and the implications for our country’s rating.
Staffer: Well, we feel that in order to prevent this from happening again that we must have a way to control spending and balancing the budget is a way to support that.
Me: And I completely understand that, but again: why now? Given the implications over the next few days. I mean, I don’t know how much influence you have over the Congressman.
Staffer: I do have some influence.
Me: I wasn’t suggesting you didn’t, sorry…
Staffer: No, I don’t mean to be argumentative.
Me: You’re not. I really appreciate your honesty, and for listening.
Staffer: Look, I’ll tell you something others won’t say: it’s political theater. This balanced budget amendment, it’s an opportunity for them to advocate for their position. There’s a heavy spotlight on this and we feel like, even though we know it won’t work, that the impact of having that as part of the discussion is really what we’re after.
Me: Wow, that’s interesting. There’s a strategy. I appreciate you being honest, really!
Staffer: Hey, this is cool for me, too. To hear from someone other than a tea party person. [laughs].
Me: [laughs]
Staffer: Look at healthcare. Look how many times that was shot down. But people still kept pushing, and it finally got there. That’s where your congressman is at.
Me: Political theater.
Staffer: Political theater.
Me: Go have a beer!
Staffer: I can’t wait to have a beer.

 

Forbes, Hurt, Cantor, Griffith: I got your voicemail service today.  Call you in the morning!

Story League: Powers That Be Performance

July 19th, 2011

 

Here’s my latest performance about bucking authority, as told at the sold out, This American Life-endorsed, Story League Show on July 6.

 

 

New Show!

June 21st, 2011

 

 

 

James Frey and Oprah Seek Redemption for the Moment Which Joined Them Forever

May 20th, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redemption is a complicated concept. It implies that a person or persons must take action to gain back good will, but judgment on whether it’s achieved is reserved for external sources. In other words, one may feel redeemed, but unless others agree, it doesn’t really count. In a two-part episode that aired this week, Oprah and the A Million Little Pieces author sat down to revisit the defining moment in which their lives – and what they stood for – became entwined.

 

It started in 2006. Pieces was already a critical darling and New York Times bestseller when Oprah chose it as her book club selection. When Frey got the news from Winfrey’s producers, he went into a state of happy shock. He knew this would mean big sales…but the other side of that coin was big exposure and Frey had made it this far without his book being exposed for the half-truths it contained. Higher profile meant more scrutiny. Still, he risked it and went on the show to talk about his book. Big mistake. Not long after, The Smoking Gun went public with its findings after they investigated the facts in Pieces and the rest, as they say, is history.

 

I felt what Frey did was wrong, but I read up on the matter and shifted my view some. When Oprah invited him back on in January 2006 to address the controversy, I watched. And I remember thinking about Oprah: who do you think you are? Which are the exact same words Oprah’s friend and renowned spiritual teacher Marianne Williamson said to her right after that episode aired. Still, Oprah didn’t get where Williamson was coming from. And when people started openly criticizing her in the media for her holier than thou tongue lashing, she still didn’t really get it. I‘d hasten to say that Oprah still didn’t get it even months before Monday’s interview, but there are more important things to expound upon…

 

ALL of it is here in this two part episode arc: what the producers told him leading up to that fateful day and how it went in a completely different direction, Oprah saying she didn’t have anything to do with the planning of the show, how Frey felt ambushed and left the country with his family to get away from the media glare almost immediately after, and the epiphany Oprah had years later when debating on whether to book Sarah Palin on her show. A voice said to her: don’t make the same mistake you made with James Frey. “I literally said to myself, ‘what is that?’ What is that mistake?’ she said, “and the voice inside myself said, ‘Do not rule from your ego.’” Because that is exactly what happened in January 2006. Oprah’s ultimate beef wasn’t that Frey had lied in Pieces. It’s that he lied to her.

 

They spent a lot of time discussing their mutual feelings about this significant episode in their lives. “Every time I’d see a story about you, every time your name is mentioned, my name is also mentioned with it,” she said. It is fascinating to watch, from many perspectives. There is an interesting discussion on art and its influence on Pieces. There is talk of the memoir genre and its changed perceptions due to this incident. But in the end what is most fascinating is watching two people come back together to discuss the involuntary tether that exists between them.

 

Yes, Oprah said she was sorry and yes, Frey said he created this mess and was thus responsible for the consequences. But it was the obvious weight of importance that hung in the air between Frey and Winfrey – more than five years after they first met – that kept me glued. Both of them needed this. Both of them wanted this…redemption. In the end, I felt they both achieved it. Or at least deserve it.

Coachella 2011

May 14th, 2011

 

My experience at Coachella…celebrities! art! music! heat!

 

Coachella 2011 from Jennifer Tress on Vimeo.